|
AGED SEEKING PSYCHIATRIC HELP: SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC
CORRELATES AND ILLNESS CHARACTERISTICS
|
|
K. PRAVEENLAL, D. P. M.,
M.D., Dip NB1 |
| S. DUBE, P. H. D2 |
| D. MOHAN, M.D3 |
| K.S. SUNDARAM4 |
| INTRODUCTION |
| Improvement
in health care system, leading to declining death rates would result in a
progressive rise in the aged population in the coming years. India,
several years ago was a country with young population and in the years to
come, would have a significant percentage of the aged population like
other developing countries. |
| The care of
elderly persons should go beyond disease orientation and involve their
total well being, taking into account the interdependence of the physical,
mental, social, spiritual and environmental factors(U. N. 1982) To mach
adding years to life by adding life to years is the present concern (EL -
GUEBALY 1983). |
| Epidemiological
studies on psychiatric illnesses in India showed a wide variation of
prevalence from 2.2%(DUBE 1970) to 33.3% (NANDI et al 1975) for
psychogeriatric problem. The data were not comparable as the operational
definition for a case, age grouping and location varied (MOHAN & LAL
1986) and do not assist in any conclusions. VENKOBARAO et al 1972, based
on out patient register in Madurai, reported that hose aged 60 years and
above comprised 2.3% of the total attendance. RAMACHANDRAN et al (1982)
reported that new admissions and ageing of the long stay patients
accounted for nearly 25% of mental hospital beds. Community surveys in
elderly above the age of 60 years showed a prevalence rate of
33.7%(RAMACHANDRAN et al 1981) and 8.9% (VENKOBARAO & MADHAVAN 1982)
for psychiatric illnesses. The reason for wide difference was not clear
from reports. |
| Mental
illness in old age is not synonymous with senile psychosis (RAMACHANDRAN
et al 1982). Even though the diagnosis of psychosis has been much less
reliable in aged patients (LEUCHTER and SPARRI 1985). the psychiatrically
morbid can be grouped into various diagnostic categories. Results of
Indian Studies showed comparable results in each category of hospital
studies (VENKOBARAO 1981, PADMA RAJU 1982, ICMRI 1984) or community
surveys (RAMACHANDRAN et al 1982, VENKOBARAO & MADHAVAN 1982). |
| The present
study attempted to study the nature of psychiatric disorders in the aged
coming to a psychiatric outpatient department of the General Hospital. The
study was planned with hope that the observations made and the results
would be of assistance in planning better management for the aged seeking
psychiatric help and a pointer for further research. |
| AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES : To find out socio-demographic correlates of aged seeking
psychiatric help and to assess the diagnostic categories of psychiatric
disorders according to I. C. D.-9. |
| METHODOLOGY :
Patients for this study were selected from the Psychiatric services of All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. Inclusion criteria were. (i)
Age 60 years and above. (ii) Case diagnosed as having a psychiatric
illness by the consultant in Psychiatry. The exclusion criteria were. (i)
doubtful chrmological age. (ii) absence in Psychiatric illness (iii)
Unwillingness to participate in the study (iv) Continuous illness for more
than 3 years of episodic illness with present episode continuously since
57 yearsor before: to exclude graduate cases (v) Non availability of an
independent informant who was staying with patient for a atleast 6 months,
continuously in the past, It was planned to study a minimum of 50
patients. |
| Controls
were selected from the relatives accompanying patients or from general
public. They were group matched with the patients sample for age, sex and
education status. The only inclusion criteria in them was age above 16
years and exclusion criteria were (i) suffering from a psychiatric illness
or past history of it. (ii) Not a first degree relative of a patient from
experimental sample. It was planned to study minimum of 30 controls. |
| The data was
collected by means of a semi structured interview and recorded on the
proforma constructed for the purpose. Patients and controlls were
explained the purpose of the study and their consent and co operation
sought. The interview was conducted after establishing report, obtaining
consent and ensuring confidentiality. The language used for instructions
were English and Hindi , depending on the preference of the subject, which
were applied uniformly. |
| The data was
collected under various sub heading using deferent tools described below. |
| 1) Personal
particulars - Information regarding age, sex, marital status, Number of
children, and educational status was obtained from patient and / or
attendant recorded on part ( A) of the proforma. |
| 2) Clinical
variables - Information under this category was collected using part (B)
of the proforma. It included - (i) presenting complaints and History (ii)
Details of present illness such as mode of onset, precipitating factors
and progression (iii) Details of past illness in the past. |
| 3) Socio -
Economic status - This was ascertained using Kuppuswamy's scale. |
| 4) Mental status
examination - This was ascertained using the standardized psychiatric
interview (GOLD BERG et al 1970). As per the liberty given by the author,
the opening section was modified, because much of data was collected using
part (B) of the proforma. The interview began from page 3 of the
manual. The schedule was fairly economical in time (approximately 30
Minutes for patient with functional psychiatric illness ). The schedule
reliability co - efficient between interviewer , and co-rator of the
interview was found to be 0.92 (GOLD BERG et al 1970). Using the schedule,
10 reported symptoms and 12 manifest abnormalities were elicited and
graded on a 5 point scale (0.5) according to the severity. |
| 5) Psychiatric
diagnosis - Diagnosis of psychiatric condition was reached according to
international classification of diseases 9th revision (WHO 1978). |
| The patient
and control samples were compared for all the variables. All the
differences were further tested by chi-squaire to find cut the level of
significance. |
| OBSERVATION
AND RESULTS : For a large number of patients, socio-economic status
could not be ascertained, using Kuppuswamy's scale, due to unreliability
and unwillingness to disclose the exact income. Standardized Psychiatric
Interview was originally meant for epidemiological studies and picks up
neurotic symptoms mainly (GOLD BERG et al 1970). However it had been used
for assessment of elderly demented (WINSLOW et al 1985). Selection og this
tool was hence justified. In India, it was used in assessing the
psychiatric morbidity in menopausal women (JAIPRAKASH & MURTHY 1981)
and factory workers (STIJA et al 1984) and found satisfactory. Out of 58
patients, only 48 could be interviewed using both parts of SPI. Ten
patients who could not be interviewed were four cases of acute confusional
state, three manics and three withdrawn depressives. However part II of
the tool could be used to carry out the mental state examination of all
the patients. |
| The
proposed sample size in the materials had been covered as the study was
done on 58 patients and 30 controls. |
|
Patients
and controls were group matched for age, sex and educational
status (Table I) (a) and could be compared on other variables.
Majority patients (87.9%) were within the age range of 60 to 74 years. The
group was dominated by male to female ration being 1 : 0.7.
|
| Majority
of patients (87.9%) belonged to Hindu religion. For a large number of
patients, the socio-economic status could not be ascertained due to in
adequated information. More than 2/4th of patients and alive spouse at the
time of study. None in the sample were single, separated or divorced.
However, on comparison with controls, on significant differences could be
observed on the parameters of religion, socio-economic status and marital
status (Table l b). |
| Diagnostic
breakup of patient group is given in Table ll. out of 58 patients; 41 were
Manic Depressive Psychosis, 10 were organic brain syndrome, 3 were
paraphrenics and the rest were Neurosis or adjustments disorder. |
| Table
lll shows Psychiatric illness characteristics.
Majority of the functional psychiatric group are acute in onset, while
majority of OBS were sub acute or insidious in onset. Approximately 1/4th
of patients had some precipitating factor-before the onset of illness. Two
organic causes-steroid in take and epilepsy-were preceding the organic
brain syndrome. The rest 14 were distributed as prior to episode of
effective illness (22%), 4 before the onset of Neuroses(80%) and 1 before
OBS(11%). No statistical analysis was possible as the numbers in each subcategory
were too small. |
| Symptom
profile of Manic Depressive Psychosis patients are given
in table lV a and b. Among
reported symptoms, anxiety, lack of concentration and irritability. Phobia
and obsessions as symptoms was reported by only one patient each and none
reported depersonalization. Among manifest abnormalities, depressive
thought content ranked highest. It was followed by depressed appearance,
excessive concern with bodily functions, agitation, thought
disorder/delusion and lacking spontaneity. None had flattened, incongruent
mood or intellectual impairment. As the number of patients in other
categories were a few symptom profile of them is not being presented here. |
| DISCUSSION
: The study of Psychiatric illness of aged population is a recent
phenomenon. The epidemiological studies on aged population abroad (BLAZER
& WILLIAMS et al 1981; O'HARA et al 1985) and in India (RAMACHANDRAN
et al 1981; VENKOBARAO & MADHAVAN 1982) showed that it is not an
uncommon entity. |
| The
patients above 74 years of age were in small number in the present study.
Same trend was observed in another hospital based
study (ICMR 1984) and may
be representative of population characteristics. |
| The
present study had a male predominance over females, the male to female
ratio being 1 : 0.3 (VENKOBA RAO 1981) 1: 0.8 (PADMA RAJU 1982) and 1 :
0.3 (ICMR 1984). However, the epidemiological studies on aged showed a
different picture, male or female ratio being 1 : 1.2 (VENKOBA RAO et al
1982) and 1:1.7 (RAMACHANDRA et al 1982). The male predominance among the
admission to hospital for psychiatric care had been explained by various
authors (RAO 1967; VENKOBA RAO et al 1972, 1981) on the basis of socio-
cultural and economic factors, peculiar to the Indian Society. The same
may be applicable to the present observation also. |
| Higher
number of educated in the present study sample may be done to the location
of Centre in Metropolitan city and it's status of tertiary care referral Centre.
Predominance of Hindu religion may be representing the cross section of
the population present in the catchment area of the Centre. However, this
statistical analysis showed that educational status, religion or
socio-economic status had no influence on the development of psychiatric
illness in the old age. |
| 78%
of patients had a live spouse at the time of the study which was
comparable with other hospital studies as 78% (PADMARAJU 1982 ) and 67% (ICMR
1984 ). Again, epidemiological studies on Psychiatric morbidity of the
aged population in India showed a different picture, the married being
lesser; 50% (RAMACHANDRAN et al 1981 ) and 49% ( VENKOBARAO & MADHAVAN
1982 ) only. This may be due to under diagnosis of psychiatric illness in
the community, probably because the depression in windowed is perceived by
relative as something inevitable, leading to lesser number of such
patients being brought to hospital for treatment. 71% of patients were
suffering from M.D.P. This figure was higher than other similar studies on
aged as 40% in typical psychiatric clinic in North India (WIG 1981).
However, our findings are comparable with the observation of the
epidemiological which showed 62% (RAMACHANDRAN et al 1982) and 67% (VENKOBA
RAO & MADHAVAN 1982 ) of Psychiatrically morbid aged was suffering
frome depression. The figures are not strictly comparable as the
epidemiological studies used their own definitions for diagnosis and not
I.C.D. -9 as in the present study |
| 5%
of patients in the present study were paraphrenics, comparable to I.C.M.R.
(1984) figure of 7% which also kept the critearia exclude the graduate
cases and lesser than other two studies. |
| 9%
of patients in the present sample belonged to Nuerosis and other group,
which was comparable to 9% (VENKOBA RAO 1981), 13% (PADMARAJU 1982) and
16% ICMR (1984). Lesser intencity of symptoms and lack of psychotic
features may lead to relatives' missing the illness which will be
reflected in lesser number of such patients being brought for treatment to
hospital. However the epidemiological study also showed this small
percentage as 18% (VEKOBA RAO & MADHAVAN 1982 ) and 20% (RAMACHANDRAN
et al 1982) of the psychiatrically morbid aged being Neurotic. Whether
lesser prevalence of Neurotic illness in the aged is real or apparent is
yet unclear. The possibilities are the under diagnosis due to inefficiency
of the tools used in epidemiological studies to pick up the Neurotic
symptoms of the aged,or the method of diagnostic grouping as dubbing
endogenous and Neurotic depressive in to one broad group of depression. |
| While
majority of the functional psychiatric illness were acute in onset,
majority in the organic brain syndrome were sub acute or insidious in
onset. This is understandable as 2/3rd of patients in that group were of
senile dementia. |
| Over
the last 20 years, there had been a large number of research into the
relationship between life events and psychiatric illness. Reported studies
indicate that more life events were experienced by depressive (PAYKEL
1969, PRAKASH et al 1980); schizophrenics (BRILEY & BROWN 1970, WIG ET
AL 1984) and psychiatric patients as a group (SAXENA 1981), before the
onset relapse of their symptoms when compared with controls; although the
view had been contradicted by others (FOREST et al 1965, JANAKI
RADHAKRISHNAN 1984). The present sample 27.5% of total patient group
precipitating factors. No conclusion could be drawn from these findings as
number of patients in the diagnostic categories except MDP was small. It
was not comparable with other published data on life events and
psychiatric morbidity as only precipitating cause is considered in the
study, instead of systematic search for any significant life events for
any period preceding the onset of symptom. |
| Among
the MDP patients the predominant symptoms were depressive thought content,
fatigue and depressed mood, sleep disturbance and objective depression.
VENKOBARAO (1981) found similar symptoms predominating as sadness and
depressed mood, somatic symptoms and signs and lack of energy; while for (PADMARAJU
1982) it were reduced sleep and appetitle, reported and apparent sdaness,
pessimistic thought, lassitude and slowness of movement inner tension. The
core symptoms were similar, though the findings of these three studies are
not strictly comparable due to different tools need (SPI, WHO/ SADD and CP
RS respectively). |
|
CONCLUSIONS |
| While
psychiatric illness of aged population is not uncommon, patients above 74
years were in smaller number. The present study showed a male predominance
over female .Educational status ,religion or socio economic satus had no
influence on the aged seeking psychiatric help. Contrary to
epidemiological studies, hospital based studies, including present, one
showed majority of patients having alive spouse at the time of
consultation . Among diagnostic categories; MDP listed top followed by
OBS; while neurotics were a few. The onset of illness was acute
insidious for organics brain symptoms 27% of patients had precipitating
causes prior to onset of symptoms. Depressive thought content, fatigue and
depressed mood, sleep disturbance and objective depression were the
predominant symptoms of the MDP
patients. |